The decisive battle of the Reconquista was the Batte of las Navas de
Tolosa which delivered Toledo and central Spain to the Christians. The Battle
of the Puig illustrated here was fought two decades later (1237). The battle
opened the way for the Aragonese conquest of Valencia (1237). The Arogonese
royal forces were led by Bernat Guillem d'Entença who fought the forces of the
Taifa of Valencia commanded by Zayyan ibn Mardanish. The red and yellow were
the colors of Aragon and would eventually become the colors of the Spanish
flag. The battle was a decisive victory for the Aragonese as the Christian
forces of the Reconquista pushed relentlessly south. The painting is attributed
to Andrés Marçal de Sax about 1400-20. Holding: Victoria and Albert Museum,
London.
The impact of the crusades on the way Europeans fought was
far-ranging. Contact with Byzantium and the Near East affected western European
fortification and siegecraft, leading directly to the construction of castle
complexes and ways to reduce them. Tactically, the invading mounted cavalry
would meet their greatest challenge in the incumbent weapon system of the Near
East, light cavalry. The conflict between these two cavalries would teach
valuable lessons to the western Europeans about the strengths and weaknesses of
their own mounted shock combat and the importance of combined arms when dealing
with enemy light cavalry. But these lessons were not only learned in the
Levant. On the Iberian peninsula, Christian commanders adapted to the novel
tactics and technologies of the Moors in their four-and-a-half-century struggle
with Islam known to history as the Reconquista, or ‘Reconquest’ of Spain.
In the early summer of 711, Muslim invaders from north
Africa had crossed the Strait of Gibraltar and attacked the Iberian peninsula.
This Arab-led Berber army crossed from Morocco to the southernmost tip of
Spain, landing on a huge rock the Arabs named Jebel Tariq (‘Rock of Tariq’),
after their commanding general, from which the modern-day Gibraltar derives its
name. General Tariq ibn Ziyad’s military expedition was the latest of a series
of Islamic conquests that brought lands stretching from Morocco to Persia under
the banner of the Crescent Moon.
Although Tariq was an Arab, he commanded an army that was
made up mostly of Berbers, a north African people recently converted to Islam.
After gathering more Arab reinforcements from north Africa, the Muslim army
swept north, defeating the army of the Christian Visigothic king Rodrigo at
Guadelete in July, then marched north again and seized the Christian capital at
Toledo. Visigothic resistance melted away and by 714 nearly the entire
peninsula lay under Arab rule. The Arab conquerors quickly established an
Islamic state in what they called Al-Andalus, known to historians as Moorish
Spain.
After the rival Abbasid dynasty ended the Umayyad Caliphate
in Damascus in 750, the surviving Umayyad ruler set up an independent caliphate
in Spain, but was held in check by the Spanish March put in place by
Charlemagne in the 770s. But as the Carolingian Empire began to lose its power
and influence in the middle of the ninth century, this Spanish March became
vulnerable to Moorish attacks. Christian Barcelona was sacked in 852, and the
Spanish March fractured into what would become the smaller kingdoms of Aragon,
Navarre, Castile and Leon.
In 1031 the Umayyad Caliphate disintegrated into
twenty-three small and relatively weak states, called the Taifa kingdoms. No
longer threatened by a strong centralized Islamic state to the south, the small
Christian kingdoms in northern Spain were finally able to attempt expansion. In
1064 the duke of Aquitaine joined the Catalonians and Aragonese and attacked
Barbastro, cutting its water supply and taking the city after a forty-day
siege. The Christians massacred the Muslim men and enslaved their women and
children. And although Barbastro was retaken by the Muslims, this attack is
usually considered the opening phase of the Spanish Reconquista. What began as
a regional conflict eventually evolved into a pan-European crusading movement,
complete with military orders and papal sponsorship.
Like Carolingian France, Christian Spain adopted feudalism
in an attempt to meet its manpower needs, but the term ‘feudal’ should be used
sparingly here. Although there was an institutionalized requirement for lords
to provide troops for their monarchs, it was a far cry from the strict Frankish
feudal system developed north of the Pyrenees, mostly because of its uneven
application by the various Spanish kingdoms. The Spanish rulers in Aragon,
Navarre, Castile and Leon maintained the right to summon armies in times of
need, but the overall effectiveness of these peasant levies was suspect, and
these monarchs’ reliance on mercenaries (both Christian and Muslim) began to take
a toll on the combat effectiveness of their armies. However, through the use of
milites (professional, full-time soldiers, armed with lance and spear) and
caballeros villanos (non-noble knights supported by termed benefices), these
Spanish kings created capable armies for the reconquest of central and southern
Spain and Portugal.
As the Christians pushed south of the sierras and onto the
high plains, long-distance raiding or cabalgadas increased in importance.
Military campaigns involved raiding and the besieging and capture of cities.
And once land was liberated from the infidel, these same Christian monarchs
used captured castles and fortified towns or built new ones to pacify recently
conquered land or as bases to launch raids deeper into enemy territory. This
expanding Spanish frontier became, in the words of one well-respected
historian, ‘a society organized for war’.
Eventually, as towns were liberated, they were divided by
their new Christian landlords into cabalerias (cavalry portions exempt from taxation)
and peonias (infantry portions where taxes were paid), and areas of land were
granted to settlers (peones) who were willing to provide the assigned
obligation. Peones who became rich enough could become caballeros villanos. The
numerous Muslim Andalusian troops who remained to serve in Christian armies
were simply listed as non-noble cavallers or horsemen.
With access to more land to support cavalry, the composition
of the Christian feudal army began to change, with lords fielding more cavalry
at the expense of infantry. Spanish lords did utilize Frankish-style heavy
cavalry, but added a lighter version to their tactical mix. These light cavalry
mounts were thoroughbreds (jinetes) equipped with low saddles, shorter
stirrups, and specially shaped palate bits for increased control (and therefore
mobility). This new bit allowed for neck reining, which gave the rider more
control over his mount. The short stirrup and low saddle differed from those of
knights from the rest of Europe who sat securely straight-legged on high
saddles, a position ideal for shock combat using lances. This new Spanish light
cavalry’s short stirrup and low saddle also allowed for quick remounting, and
the smaller and faster mounts were better suited to counter the lighter and more
agile Muslim light cavalry horse archers and mounted javelineers that used the
karr-wa-farr (simulated flight) as their best offence. This new Christian light
horse went so far as to adopt a similar feigned retreat, known to the Spanish
as torna-fuye.
The Christians fought with a combined-arms tactical system
which included unarticulated heavy infantry, light infantry bowmen and
javelineers, northern European-style heavy cavalry and the new,
Moorish-inspired light cavalry. Christian troops were usually better armoured
than their Muslim counterparts, with noble and non-noble milites and cavallers
wearing mail hauberks, separate mail coifs and metal helmets, and armed with
maces, cavalry axes, sword and, if properly saddled, lances.
The Islamic forces engaged against the Spanish Christians
were primarily cavalry, with mounted soldiers outnumbering the foot soldiers.
Muslim and Christian light troops, both mounted and unmounted, used javelins
(weapons discarded north of the Pyrenees after the Viking age) and powerful
composite bows effectively, but Muslim light cavalry and light infantry
generally went to war unarmoured. The Muslims also utilized an ancient Berber
strategy of using camel laagers as a screen from which to launch attacks (the
smell of Berber camels confused Christian horses untrained to work with this
type of animal), and were still using stationary infantry phalanxes as a
defensive formation, supported by light infantry bowmen and javelineers. North
African Berber troops, like Mongol warriors centuries later, were also trained
to manoeuvre silently to the sound of massed drums, a sight which no doubt
unsettled their Christian adversaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment